There are three (3) levels or types of review:
The type of review your proposal will need depends on the level of risk to the human subjects in the research:
Exempt
Research with very minimal risk to human subjects (as determined by regulatory guidelines-see our Policy and Procedures guidelines and the Office for Human Research Protections website for more information on risk determination) may be exempted.
Expedited
Research involving no more than minimal risk to human subjects may be considered for expedited review.
Full
Research with greater than minimal risk to human subjects requires full review.
The main difference between these levels of review is that in the case of the “exempt” and “expedited” categories, there is no need for a majority vote from the full IRB committee. Thus, an expedited or exempt review can be conducted by an individual reviewer (or a few reviewers), rather than going to the full board. This may, but does not necessarily, mean that the review decision will take less time.
It is important to note that the decision whether a proposal will receive “exempt”, “expedited”, or “full” review is determined by the IRB, NOT the applicant.
This means that:
- Even if you believe that your research is eligible for exemption, you still have to submit a proposal, i.e., ALL research involving human subjects must go through IRB review;
- As an applicant you cannot request an “expedited” review. It is the decision of the IRB to establish whether your proposal is eligible for expedited review.